<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Party of Gno</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno</link>
	<description>A weblog for nerds, geeks and codemonkeys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:05:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Derer</title>
		<link>http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno/comment-page-1#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Derer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno#comment-934</guid>
		<description>Interesting as in &quot;typical, the original article confirming, hate talk.&quot; Yes.. it&#039;s extremely &quot;retarded&quot; and &quot;idiotic in every sense of the word&quot; to try to help the FSF with constructive criticism and an opinion that was built from a view from the outside. Stupid me. 
The author was trying to help the fsf with his point of view, because he likes the goals and ideas of free software. I can think of things more &quot;anti-fsf&quot; than that. This reaction just confirms what the article tried to point out. Sad. Really sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting as in &#8220;typical, the original article confirming, hate talk.&#8221; Yes.. it&#8217;s extremely &#8220;retarded&#8221; and &#8220;idiotic in every sense of the word&#8221; to try to help the FSF with constructive criticism and an opinion that was built from a view from the outside. Stupid me.<br />
The author was trying to help the fsf with his point of view, because he likes the goals and ideas of free software. I can think of things more &#8220;anti-fsf&#8221; than that. This reaction just confirms what the article tried to point out. Sad. Really sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mray</title>
		<link>http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno/comment-page-1#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>mray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 08:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.gotbrain.de/archives/366-the-party-of-gno#comment-933</guid>
		<description>you may find this interesting: http://www.the-source.com/2010/06/more-anti-free-software-spin/

as well as the linked articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you may find this interesting: <a href="http://www.the-source.com/2010/06/more-anti-free-software-spin/" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-source.com/2010/06/more-anti-free-software-spin/</a></p>
<p>as well as the linked articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

